• PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Explanation: The Hussites were a religious movement based in what-is-now Czechia during the 15th century AD. Protesting the perceived hypocrisy and waste of the Catholic Church, they insisted, after their leader Jan Hus was burned at the stake for heresy, on forming a separate church hierarchy and theology. The Catholic Church did not like this, and called several crusades to bring the Hussites back into the ‘loving’ arms of the Catholic Church.

    All of the called crusades failed, despite the Hussites being a regional movement made up largely of peasant militia, and the Catholic Church dominating most of Europe and having the loyalty of much of the warrior-caste nobility.

    💪🇨🇿🇨🇿🇨🇿🇨🇿🇨🇿💪

    • crushyerbones@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      But… They lost? The Hussites that “won” were a splinter movement allied with the Catholic church against the more “progressive” ones.

      • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        “Splinter movement” is a strange way to say “The most popular and oldest of the Hussite sects.”

        Not that a more radical victory wouldn’t have been based, but even Jan Zizka turned away from (and clashed with) many radical groups of the period. I don’t think it’s reasonable to reduce the importance of the victory just because the most radical of the groups didn’t win - the Hussites successfully repelled the Catholic crusaders and enjoyed some 200 years of religious independence.

        • crushyerbones@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          That’s interesting! I really do need to read up more on the subject as I was under the impression it had been a failed movement.

          • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            Some of the movements of the period are really incredible, radical agrarian socialist kind of things. But they were never the main thrust of the movement.

            The big divide was between the (radical, often rural) Taborites and the (moderate, often urban) Utraquists/Praguers, and both existed essentially since the very beginning of the conflict. The groups more radical than the Taborites were pretty universally suppressed by both sides. The Taborites as a military force were defeated during a period of internal conflict, but their ideals persisted in the Moravian Church. The Hussite/Utraquist Church survived all the way up to the Protestant Reformation.

            Jan Zizka initially sided with the Taborites, but would later join a more moderate splinter group because he felt the Taborites were becoming too radical.

  • Ininewcrow@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 days ago

    Another historic example that the Catholic Church is a religion of money and power … and has little to do with any historic middle eastern religion