• ohulancutash@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    Except they wouldn’t as the UK wouldn’t exist for another quarter of a century yet.

    • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      24 days ago

      Except they wouldn’t as the UK wouldn’t exist for another quarter of a century yet.

      The term “United Kingdom” was in informal use at this time, both domestically and abroad, ever since the 1707 Acts of Union.

      • Jimbo@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        24 days ago

        Oooh I read about the 1707 Acts of Union!

        I forgot all the details, but I read it

        Wasn’t there a first attempt to unite Scotland and Britain in the early 1500s or something?

        • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          23 days ago

          Kind of - a few monarchs ruled over Scotland and England, but the crowns were separate. Fairly common - known as a personal union.

          The 1707 Acts of Union made it so that the monarch over one country was automatically monarch over the other, so there would never be a ‘personal’ union again - the two kingdoms themselves were in union.

          A united kingdom, if you will :p