• PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    26 days ago

    Except they wouldn’t as the UK wouldn’t exist for another quarter of a century yet.

    The term “United Kingdom” was in informal use at this time, both domestically and abroad, ever since the 1707 Acts of Union.

    • Jimbo@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      26 days ago

      Oooh I read about the 1707 Acts of Union!

      I forgot all the details, but I read it

      Wasn’t there a first attempt to unite Scotland and Britain in the early 1500s or something?

      • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        26 days ago

        Kind of - a few monarchs ruled over Scotland and England, but the crowns were separate. Fairly common - known as a personal union.

        The 1707 Acts of Union made it so that the monarch over one country was automatically monarch over the other, so there would never be a ‘personal’ union again - the two kingdoms themselves were in union.

        A united kingdom, if you will :p