It seems like it’s just “where do you live?”, and “when are you out of town?”.

What worked for me was taking my meds the same moment I put on deoderant. That way I can double check whether I took them by smelling my armpit before I leave the house.

Way too far. I also support secularism in that I don’t believe that religions should be privileged above deeply held personal preferences. This is like religious persecution.

The article says

The bill also seeks to ban public institutions from offering a diet exclusively based on a religious tradition

I mean I would expect that no meals are based exclusively on a religious tradition, usually it’s based on a combination of religious tradition and culinary art, or nutritional requirement.

Thanks!

Hey can I ask you a question? Is English your primary language? I’m trying to understand why I so often see people omitting “to be” or using past tense as a future tense.

To me the sentence should be:

the white house needs to be burnt again.

Or

the white house needs burning again.

I’ve also seen

it needs fixed

Where the same rules should apply.

Is this the language evolving? A short hand through some phone keyboards/ autocorrect or something, or maybe you’re translating from another language. It’s totally fine, everyone understands what you’re saying. I just am trying to figure out this phenomenon.