• 0 Posts
  • 16 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 8th, 2025

help-circle

  • You aren’t alone. I remember BeOS 4 on my old Pentium II just screamed with that old ATI card. It’s always deserved better than it got, and it’s great to see the project has come so far. Especially adding resources for modern languages like this.

    The one thing I think they’re kind of sleeping on that I really wish I could find. Are versions of it compiled and packaged for a couple of popular SBC at least. I know they’ve got it running on arm as well as riscv. I feel like the Raspberry Pi and similar SBCs brought some attention and more relevance back to things like Risc OS. BeOS/Haiku It would seem perfectly suited to the towards an ecosystem like that. I’m sure it will get there someday.










  • No. Not really. Microsoft also included token ring networking and multiple others. Now however, most people would think you were a pothead if you mentioned token ring.

    Before Microsoft adopted the MIT licensed BSD stack. There were small and large alternatives. Novel netware being a huge one on the corporate side. For both Mac and PC. When I went to school for network management, we learned netware.

    AT&T had much much more influence on it’s adoption. By the 90s, if you were procuring network infrastructure, it was generally Ethernet and TCP IP. Microsoft supported it in lan manager and NT. It was also an option for Windows 3.11 and 95. But Microsoft didn’t even ship it as a base part of their home operating system until Windows 98. Even Apple beat them on that technicality.

    There has arguably been much more commercial support proprietary and otherwise of GPL than MIT licensed software. Not even close. Sony, Apple and a ton of big companies use BSD or MIT licensed code. You could do pages and pages. A practical who’s who of the tech industry as to who has borrowed MIT code. The ones that contributed back wouldn’t hardly justify a footnote. Most GPL projects, especially the big ones, have pages listing many, many corporate sponsorships and supporters, not just the Linux kernel.

    I never judged anyone for their license choice. Use the unlicense for all I care. But those sort of licenses as a rule don’t generate much actual support or contribution back.


  • Would anyone have continued to use windows without a TCP/IP stack of their own till the mid 2000? Apple?

    Inarguably in the face of the growing ubiquity of the Internet. Ms and Apple being able to just swipe the BSD stacks, giving little to nothing back. Definitely didn’t help. Which isn’t even considering what adoption *nix systems might have seen. Had Microsoft not only missed early adoption. But then struggled to implement a decent stack at the same time.

    Had it not been for it’s license and the court battle at the time. There likely would be no Linux and we’d have all been running BSD based systems for decades now.


  • Yup. Friction is the number one answer. Things just aren’t quite exactly as they expect or there’s just this one weird niche app they have to have. For my mother it was a cobbled together from parts of visual basic java and a few other things. That wine CAN run. But between the different tools and toolkits. The menubar renders incorrectly.

    The solution however was not to drop Linux. Fortunately, there was an Android version, which I couldn’t get running properly with waydroid because of poor integrated Intel graphics support, at least for non-XE cores. But a $200 tablet solved that problem. Nice big screen et cetera for her.