• PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    11 days ago

    Explanation: Teddy Roosevelt, in one of his more based moments, did a bit of campaigning against corruption in US politics. One of the targets of his ire was William Barnes, a conservative who ran in some very ‘old boys’ circles in New York politics. Barnes sued Roosevelt for libel, at which point Teddy took the stand and spent several days arguing not that he made a slip of the tongue or meant it rhetorically (which would have been a pretty airtight defense itself under US libel laws), but that he did mean it and that he could prove that it was (at least to a degree that it would be reasonable for someone to non-maliciously and genuinely believe) factual.

    He won the case, and ended Barnes’ career with it. lmao

      • voracitude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 days ago

        I dunno, his rampant and virulent racism was pretty upsetting. Not that the current crop are any better in that regard, but it’s still a big point against the guy.

      • KombatWombat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Well, there’s no shortage of politicians calling each other names and accusing each other nowadays. Political figures are pretty safe targets to verbally attack so long as you aren’t too specific or threatening. And the president has been immune to civil suits like libel for official actions since Nixon v. Fitzgerald in 1982.

        I think trusting the president to investigate government corruption is about as reliable as having the police investigate themselves. External agencies doing investigative reporting make better watchdogs. And if we do want internal checks, it makes more sense to come from the judiciary. They are at least less likely to be motivated by party affiliations and re-elections.

    • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      He was like 50% based, 45% racist motherfucker, 5% insane. Probably one of our best Presidents (though the bar is insanely low)

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        Yeah his cousin was better, but the Roosevelt family was really good for America. Well, the united states, Teddy, was more mixed for the rest of the hemisphere. Both of them were rare in that they understood that capitalism was in danger if left to its own devices. Now I’m not grateful they kept capitalism going, but they curbed its excesses and made life better for the average person.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 days ago

      Imagine how dumb you’d have to be to get into a PR dick-measuring contest with Theodore goddamn Roosevelt. Someone shot this man, and he still spent an hour enthralling a crowd.